什么是之间和的差额QUOT;安卓？＆QUOT;和＆QUOT; @android：＆QUOT;在Android的布局XML文件？

什么是之间的区别在Android的布局XML文件机器人：？：和@android？他们似乎是重复使用Android SDK中的资源互换的方式。

What's the difference between "?android:" and "@android:" in an android layout xml file? They seem to be interchangeable ways of reusing android SDK resources.

我发现的唯一的差异是由以下例子所示。

The only difference I discovered is illustrated by the following example.

下面TextView的的右边缘与所述的ImageButton的左边缘对齐呈现

Here the TextView's right edge is rendered aligned with the left edge of the ImageButton

 <RelativeLayout
    android:id="@id/header"
    android:layout_width="match_parent"
    android:layout_height="wrap_content"
    android:background="#888888">
    <TextView
        android:id="@android:id/text1"
        android:layout_alignParentLeft="true"
        android:text="blah blah"
        android:layout_width="match_parent"
        android:layout_height="wrap_content"
        android:layout_toLeftOf="@android:id/button1" />
    <ImageButton
        android:id="@android:id/button1"
        android:layout_alignParentRight="true"
        style="@style/PlusButton" />
</RelativeLayout>

下面，但是，TextView的的右边缘对准RelativeLayout的右边缘。 TextView的重叠的ImageButton。

Here, however, the right edge of the TextView is aligned with the right edge of the RelativeLayout. The TextView overlaps the ImageButton.

<RelativeLayout
    android:id="@id/header"
    android:layout_width="match_parent"
    android:layout_height="wrap_content"
    android:background="#888888">
    <TextView
        android:id="@android:id/text1"
        android:layout_alignParentLeft="true"
        android:text="blah blah"
        android:layout_width="match_parent"
        android:layout_height="wrap_content"
        android:layout_toLeftOf="?android:id/button1" />
    <ImageButton
        android:id="?android:id/button1"
        android:layout_alignParentRight="true"
        style="@style/PlusButton" />
</RelativeLayout>

在两个布局之间唯一的区别是使用@android VS？机器人。双方没有错误编译。

The only difference between the two layouts is the use of @android vs ?android. Both compile with no errors.

谢谢了。