asp.net MVC 3剃须刀视图 - ＆GT;元组的问题强类型列表
我在与asp.net MVC的Razor视图一个奇怪的问题。
I'm having an odd problem with asp.net MVC razor view.
我希望我的模型是一个列表与LT元组LT;字符串，INT，INT，INT，INT＆GT;＆GT; 这是我在其他的C＃方法非常有效。但是，当我将其粘贴到 @model 声明似乎只挑出元组的字符串的一部分。所以，我没有整数。只有ITEM1。
I want my model to be a List<Tuple<string, int, int, int, int>> which is perfectly valid in my other c# methods. But when I paste it into the @model declaration it seems to only pick out the string part of the tuple. So I have no ints. Only item1.
这问题不是present如果我把它绑定到一个元组，而不是名单。
This problem is not present if I make it bind to a Tuple instead of the List.
好像产生code是错误的，所以也许这就是剃须刀视图中的错误？
Seems like the generated code is wrong, so perhaps this is a bug in razor view?
我在编译得到的错误是：
The error I get at compilation is:
Description: An error occurred during the compilation of a resource required to service this request. Please review the following specific error details and modify your source code appropriately.
Compiler Error Message: CS1003: Syntax error, '>' expected
Source Error:
Line 27:
Line 28:
Line 29: public class _Page_Views_Dashboard_DestinationStatistics_cshtml : System.Web.Mvc.WebViewPage<List<Tuple<string {
Line 30:
Line 31: #line hidden
要隔离这个问题，我做了以下事情：
To isolate this problem I did the following thing:
创建一个空的asp.net MVC项目。创建一个新的观点。过去以下code。
Create an empty asp.net mvc project. Create a new view. Past the following code.
@model List<Tuple<string, int, int, int, int>>
@foreach (var stat in Model)
{
<tr>
<td>
@stat.Item1
</td>
<td>
@stat.Item2
</td>
<td>
@stat.Item3
</td>
<td>
@stat.Item4
</td>
<td>
@stat.Item5
</td>
</tr>
}
我知道我可以只创建一个类或结构来保存数据，而不是。只是要求出于好奇
I know I can just create a class or a struct to hold the data instead. Just asking out of curiosity
编辑：
解决并上报MVC团队在这里的http：//aspnet.$c$cplex.com/workitem/8652
的编辑我已经修剪了这里的一些正在进行中的注释 - 只需查看历史记录看的
所以，你可以用1，2，3或4元组泛型参数这项工作，但它不与5.只要你使用5个参数工作，它产生code是这样的：
So you can make this work with 1, 2, 3 or 4 tuple generic parameters but it doesn't work with 5. As soon as you use 5 parameters it generates code like this:
public class _Page_Views_Home_Index_cshtml :
System.Web.Mvc.WebViewPage<List<System.Tuple<string {
我想只是觉得，如果它是一个字符长度的限制，所以我生成这样一个类：
I wanted to just find out if it's a character-length limitation, so I generated a class like this:
namespace ASP{ //same namespace that the backend code for the page is generated
public class T { }
}
和改变模型的声明：
@model List<Tuple<T,T,T,T,T>>.
在结束（见历史），我得
In the end (see the history) I got to
@inherits System.Web.Mvc.WebViewPage<Tuple<T,T,T,T,T>>
同样的问题！这不是与@model关键字一个问题...
Same problem! It's not a problem with the @model keyword...
过了一段时间（通过MVC3和剃刀源读取，增加了一些测试来该解决方案） - 但这里有一个测试，显示了为什么我们得到这个错误：
It took a while (reading through the MVC3 and Razor source, adding a couple of tests to that solution) - but here's a test that shows the why we get this error:
[TestMethod]
public void TestMethod()
{
System.CodeDom.CodeTypeReferenceCollection c =
new CodeDom.CodeTypeReferenceCollection();
c.Add("Tuple<T,T,T,T>");
c.Add("Tuple<T,T,T,T,T>");
//passes
Assert.AreEqual("Tuple<T,T,T,T>", c[0].BaseType);
//fails
Assert.AreEqual("Tuple<T,T,T,T,T>", c[1].BaseType);
}
所以 - 四参数版本传递，而不是5参数版本
So - the four-parameter version passes, but not the 5 parameter version.
和猜测乜实际值元组LT;吨 - 即截断泛型类型名的截断正是您已在$所观察到的同样的方式C $ç的
And guess what- the actual value is Tuple<T - i.e. a truncated generic type name truncated exactly the same way that you've observed in your code.
这两种标准的剃刀解析器和MVC的剃刀解析器解析时，使用 codeTypeReferenceCollection 类型无论是 @inherits 或 @model 关键字。这里是code生成过程中code为 @inherits ：
Both the standard Razor parser and the Mvc Razor parser use the CodeTypeReferenceCollection type when parsing either the @inherits or @model keyword. Here's the code for @inherits during code generation:
protected internal virtual void VisitSpan(InheritsSpan span) {
// Set the appropriate base type
GeneratedClass.BaseTypes.Clear();
GeneratedClass.BaseTypes.Add(span.BaseClass);
if (DesignTimeMode) {
WriteHelperVariable(span.Content, InheritsHelperName);
}
}
GeneratedClass.BaseTypes 是 codeTypeReferenceCollection - 和 span.BaseClass 是一个字符串。下面，通过在伊尔根，有问题的方法必须是私有方法 codeTypeReference.Initialize（字符串的typeName，codeTypeReferenceOptions选项）。我已经没有足够的时间，现在弄清楚为什么它打破了 - 但是这是一个微软开发者的工作，我认为:) 下面更新 - 无法抗拒。现在我知道这是错的的
GeneratedClass.BaseTypes is a CodeTypeReferenceCollection - and span.BaseClass is a string. Following that through in ILGen, the offending method must be the private method CodeTypeReference.Initialize(string typeName, CodeTypeReferenceOptions options). I've not enough time now to figure out why it breaks - but then that's a Microsoft developer's job I think :) Update below - couldn't resist. I now know where it's wrong
您不能使用泛型与任何剃刀 @inherits 或 @model 语句超过4个参数（至少在C＃中 - 不知道VB）。看来，剃刀分析器错误地使用 codeTypeReference 键入
You can't use generics with more than 4 parameters in either Razor @inherits or @model statements (at least in C# - don't know about VB). It appears that the Razor parser is incorrectly using the CodeTypeReference type.
的事情之一是 codeTypeReference 确实是剥离从通过型式名称程序集名称信息与该方法的调用 codeTypeReference.RipOffAssemblyInformationFromTypeName（字符串的typeName）。
One of the things that CodeTypeReference does is strip off assembly name information from a passed type name with a call to the method CodeTypeReference.RipOffAssemblyInformationFromTypeName(string typeName).
当然，如果你仔细想想 - 元组LT; T，T，T，T，T＆GT; 就像一集限定的类型名称：随着类型名称= 元组LT;吨，大会= T ，版本= T ，文化= T 公钥= T （如果你写了一个非常糟糕的C＃语法分析器！）。
And of course, if you think about it - Tuple<T,T,T,T,T> is just like an assembly-qualified type name: With the type name = Tuple<T, Assembly = T, Version=T, Culture=T, PublicKeyToken=T (if you write a really BAD C# parser!).
果然 - 如果你在元组下通行; T，T，T，T，T，T＆GT; 作为类型名称 - 你实际上得到一个元组LT; T，T＆GT; 。
Sure enough - if you pass in Tuple<T,T,T,T,T,T> as the type name - you actually get a Tuple<T,T>.
展望深入到code，它催芽接收语言无关的类型名称（句柄'['，但没有对'＆LT;'为例），因此，实际上，MVC开发团队不应该仅仅是移交从我们的源C＃的类型名称直通。
Looking deeper into the code, it's primed to receive a language-neutral typename (handles '[' but nothing for '<', for example) so, actually, the MVC team shouldn't just be handing the C# typename from our source straight through.
的MVC开发团队需要改变他们如何产生的基本类型的 - 他们可以使用公共codeTypeReference（字符串的typeName，则params codeTypeReference [] typeArguments）构造一个新的参考（而不是仅仅依靠。新增（span.BaseClass）创建它） ，并解析泛型参数本身，因为他们知道，类型名称将是C＃/ VB的风格 - 而不是语言中立的.Net风格的托架等作为实际名称的一部分
The MVC team needs to change how they generate the base type - They could use the public CodeTypeReference(string typeName, params CodeTypeReference[] typeArguments) constructor for a new reference (instead of just relying on the .Add(span.BaseClass) creating it), and parse the generic parameters themselves since they know that the type name will be C#/VB style - not language-neutral .Net style with brackets etc as part of the actual name.