JVM stack overflow
场景:诡谲的JVM Crash之EXCEPTION_STACK_OVERFLOW
诡异的JVM Crash之EXCEPTION_STACK_OVERFLOW
关于JVM的一个常识是:如果对象被意外地持有很容易造成内存泄漏,而如果同时又在不停地生成新对象,就有很大的机率造成内存溢出。通常情况下,这种溢出会导致JVM抛出OutOfMemoryError,然后JVM挂起。
可是来试试下面的代码,真是让人有点诧异,分别在JDK1.4、JDK5、JDK6上都表现一致。
package crash;
public class JVMCrashTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
testCrash();
} catch (Throwable t) {
t.printStackTrace();
System.out.println("catch an exception! I'm dead!");
}
}
/**
* JVM挂掉,core dump
*/
static void testCrash() {
Object[] o = null;
int line = 0;
while (true) {
o = new Object[] { o };
line++;
if (line % 1000 == 0) {
System.out.println(line);
}
}
}
}
没有机会抓异常,JVM直接Crash。Windows上会有hs_err日志产生,好一个EXCEPTION_STACK_OVERFLOW。Linux上面连日志都没有,直接segment fault。
static testCrash()V
L0
LINENUMBER 13 L0
ACONST_NULL
CHECKCAST [Ljava/lang/Object;
ASTORE 0
L1
LINENUMBER 14 L1
ICONST_0
ISTORE 1
L2
LINENUMBER 15 L2
NEW java/lang/Object
DUP
INVOKESPECIAL java/lang/Object.<init>()V
ASTORE 2
L3
LINENUMBER 17 L3
FRAME APPEND [[Ljava/lang/Object; I java/lang/Object]
ICONST_1
ANEWARRAY java/lang/Object
DUP
ICONST_0
ALOAD 0
AASTORE
ASTORE 0
L4
LINENUMBER 19 L4
IINC 1 1
L5
LINENUMBER 20 L5
ILOAD 1
SIPUSH 1000
IREM
IFNE L3
L6
LINENUMBER 21 L6
GETSTATIC java/lang/System.out : Ljava/io/PrintStream;
ILOAD 1
INVOKEVIRTUAL java/io/PrintStream.println(I)V
L7
LINENUMBER 16 L7
FRAME SAME
GOTO L3
L8
LOCALVARIABLE o [Ljava/lang/Object; L1 L8 0
LOCALVARIABLE line I L2 L8 1
LOCALVARIABLE a Ljava/lang/Object; L3 L8 2
MAXSTACK = 4
MAXLOCALS = 3
static testCrash()V
L0
LINENUMBER 13 L0
ACONST_NULL
CHECKCAST [Ljava/lang/Object;
ASTORE 0
L1
LINENUMBER 14 L1
ICONST_0
ISTORE 1
L2
LINENUMBER 15 L2
NEW java/lang/Object
DUP
INVOKESPECIAL java/lang/Object.<init>()V
ASTORE 2
L3
LINENUMBER 24 L3
ICONST_1
ANEWARRAY java/lang/Object
DUP
ICONST_0
ALOAD 0
AASTORE
ASTORE 0
L4
LINENUMBER 25 L4
RETURN
L5
LOCALVARIABLE o [Ljava/lang/Object; L1 L5 0
LOCALVARIABLE line I L2 L5 1
LOCALVARIABLE a Ljava/lang/Object; L3 L5 2
MAXSTACK = 4
MAXLOCALS = 3
static testCrash()V
L0
LINENUMBER 13 L0
ACONST_NULL
CHECKCAST [Ljava/lang/Object;
ASTORE 0
L1
LINENUMBER 15 L1
NEW java/lang/Object
DUP
INVOKESPECIAL java/lang/Object.<init>()V
ASTORE 1
L2
LINENUMBER 24 L2
ICONST_1
ANEWARRAY java/lang/Object
DUP
ICONST_0
ALOAD 0
AASTORE
ASTORE 0
L3
LINENUMBER 25 L3
ICONST_1
ANEWARRAY java/lang/Object
DUP
ICONST_0
ALOAD 0
AASTORE
ASTORE 0
L4
LINENUMBER 26 L4
RETURN
L5
LOCALVARIABLE o [Ljava/lang/Object; L1 L5 0
LOCALVARIABLE a Ljava/lang/Object; L2 L5 1
MAXSTACK = 4
MAXLOCALS = 2
now the last
// access flags 8
static testCrash()V
L0
LINENUMBER 13 L0
ACONST_NULL
CHECKCAST [Ljava/lang/Object;
ASTORE 0
L1
LINENUMBER 24 L1
ICONST_1
ANEWARRAY java/lang/Object
DUP
ICONST_0
ALOAD 0
AASTORE
ASTORE 0
L2
LINENUMBER 25 L2
ICONST_1
ANEWARRAY java/lang/Object
DUP
ICONST_0
ALOAD 0
AASTORE
ASTORE 0
L3
LINENUMBER 26 L3
RETURN
L4
LOCALVARIABLE o [Ljava/lang/Object; L1 L4 0
MAXSTACK = 4
MAXLOCALS = 1
诡异的JVM Crash之EXCEPTION_STACK_OVERFLOW
关于JVM的一个常识是:如果对象被意外地持有很容易造成内存泄漏,而如果同时又在不停地生成新对象,就有很大的机率造成内存溢出。通常情况下,这种溢出会导致JVM抛出OutOfMemoryError,然后JVM挂起。
可是来试试下面的代码,真是让人有点诧异,分别在JDK1.4、JDK5、JDK6上都表现一致。
package crash;
public class JVMCrashTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
testCrash();
} catch (Throwable t) {
t.printStackTrace();
System.out.println("catch an exception! I'm dead!");
}
}
/**
* JVM挂掉,core dump
*/
static void testCrash() {
Object[] o = null;
int line = 0;
while (true) {
o = new Object[] { o };
line++;
if (line % 1000 == 0) {
System.out.println(line);
}
}
}
}
没有机会抓异常,JVM直接Crash。Windows上会有hs_err日志产生,好一个EXCEPTION_STACK_OVERFLOW。Linux上面连日志都没有,直接segment fault。
static testCrash()V
L0
LINENUMBER 13 L0
ACONST_NULL
CHECKCAST [Ljava/lang/Object;
ASTORE 0
L1
LINENUMBER 14 L1
ICONST_0
ISTORE 1
L2
LINENUMBER 15 L2
NEW java/lang/Object
DUP
INVOKESPECIAL java/lang/Object.<init>()V
ASTORE 2
L3
LINENUMBER 17 L3
FRAME APPEND [[Ljava/lang/Object; I java/lang/Object]
ICONST_1
ANEWARRAY java/lang/Object
DUP
ICONST_0
ALOAD 0
AASTORE
ASTORE 0
L4
LINENUMBER 19 L4
IINC 1 1
L5
LINENUMBER 20 L5
ILOAD 1
SIPUSH 1000
IREM
IFNE L3
L6
LINENUMBER 21 L6
GETSTATIC java/lang/System.out : Ljava/io/PrintStream;
ILOAD 1
INVOKEVIRTUAL java/io/PrintStream.println(I)V
L7
LINENUMBER 16 L7
FRAME SAME
GOTO L3
L8
LOCALVARIABLE o [Ljava/lang/Object; L1 L8 0
LOCALVARIABLE line I L2 L8 1
LOCALVARIABLE a Ljava/lang/Object; L3 L8 2
MAXSTACK = 4
MAXLOCALS = 3
static testCrash()V
L0
LINENUMBER 13 L0
ACONST_NULL
CHECKCAST [Ljava/lang/Object;
ASTORE 0
L1
LINENUMBER 14 L1
ICONST_0
ISTORE 1
L2
LINENUMBER 15 L2
NEW java/lang/Object
DUP
INVOKESPECIAL java/lang/Object.<init>()V
ASTORE 2
L3
LINENUMBER 24 L3
ICONST_1
ANEWARRAY java/lang/Object
DUP
ICONST_0
ALOAD 0
AASTORE
ASTORE 0
L4
LINENUMBER 25 L4
RETURN
L5
LOCALVARIABLE o [Ljava/lang/Object; L1 L5 0
LOCALVARIABLE line I L2 L5 1
LOCALVARIABLE a Ljava/lang/Object; L3 L5 2
MAXSTACK = 4
MAXLOCALS = 3
static testCrash()V
L0
LINENUMBER 13 L0
ACONST_NULL
CHECKCAST [Ljava/lang/Object;
ASTORE 0
L1
LINENUMBER 15 L1
NEW java/lang/Object
DUP
INVOKESPECIAL java/lang/Object.<init>()V
ASTORE 1
L2
LINENUMBER 24 L2
ICONST_1
ANEWARRAY java/lang/Object
DUP
ICONST_0
ALOAD 0
AASTORE
ASTORE 0
L3
LINENUMBER 25 L3
ICONST_1
ANEWARRAY java/lang/Object
DUP
ICONST_0
ALOAD 0
AASTORE
ASTORE 0
L4
LINENUMBER 26 L4
RETURN
L5
LOCALVARIABLE o [Ljava/lang/Object; L1 L5 0
LOCALVARIABLE a Ljava/lang/Object; L2 L5 1
MAXSTACK = 4
MAXLOCALS = 2
now the last
// access flags 8
static testCrash()V
L0
LINENUMBER 13 L0
ACONST_NULL
CHECKCAST [Ljava/lang/Object;
ASTORE 0
L1
LINENUMBER 24 L1
ICONST_1
ANEWARRAY java/lang/Object
DUP
ICONST_0
ALOAD 0
AASTORE
ASTORE 0
L2
LINENUMBER 25 L2
ICONST_1
ANEWARRAY java/lang/Object
DUP
ICONST_0
ALOAD 0
AASTORE
ASTORE 0
L3
LINENUMBER 26 L3
RETURN
L4
LOCALVARIABLE o [Ljava/lang/Object; L1 L4 0
MAXSTACK = 4
MAXLOCALS = 1