有关问题:使用反射是否破坏了程序的封装性
问题:使用反射是否破坏了程序的封装性
今天看到问答里有人发了一个关于反射的问题,是如何利用反射来获取类的私有构造函数并进行类的实例化的,由此想到Java提供private关键字就是用来控制类的成员变量和方法在外部无法可见,那么使用反射能够获取到类的私有构造函数,成员变量和方法,并对其进行操作,那么这样做是否破坏了程序的封装性呢?
有人说无法实现访问调用私有的构造函数,再次实践证明。
package com.dream.reflection; /** * Created by IntelliJ IDEA. * User: Zhong Gang * Date: 11-9-24 * Time: 下午7:02 */ public class User { private Integer id; private int number; private String name; private User(Integer id) { this.id = id; } private User(int number) { this.number = number; } private User(String name) { this.name = name; } private User(Integer id, String name) { this.id = id; this.name = name; } public Integer getId() { return id; } public String getName() { return name; } public int getNumber() { return number; } }
package com.dream.reflection; import junit.framework.TestCase; import java.lang.reflect.Constructor; /** * Created by IntelliJ IDEA. * User: Zhong Gang * Date: 11-9-24 * Time: 下午7:03 */ public class UserRelectionTest extends TestCase { public void testConstructorReflection() throws Exception { Class<User> clazz = User.class; Constructor<User> constructor = clazz.getDeclaredConstructor(Integer.class); constructor.setAccessible(true); User user = constructor.newInstance(Integer.valueOf("1")); assertEquals(Integer.valueOf("1"), user.getId()); } public void testIntReflection() throws Exception { Class<User> clazz = User.class; Constructor<User> constructor = clazz.getDeclaredConstructor(int.class); constructor.setAccessible(true); User user = constructor.newInstance(1); assertEquals(1, user.getNumber()); } public void testStringReflection() throws Exception { Class<User> clazz = User.class; Constructor<User> constructor = clazz.getDeclaredConstructor(String.class); constructor.setAccessible(true); User user = constructor.newInstance("ZhongGang"); assertEquals("ZhongGang", user.getName()); } }