Access-Control-Allow-Origin 标头如何工作?
显然,我完全误解了它的语义.我想到了这样的事情:
Apparently, I have completely misunderstood its semantics. I thought of something like this:
- 客户端从
http://siteA
- 源 下载 javascript 代码 MyCode.js. - MyCode.js 的响应头包含 Access-Control-Allow-Origin:
http://siteB
,我认为这意味着 MyCode.js 被允许对站点 B 进行跨域引用. - 客户端触发 MyCode.js 的某些功能,然后向
http://siteB
发出请求,尽管是跨域请求,但应该没问题.
- A client downloads javascript code MyCode.js from
http://siteA
- the origin. - The response header of MyCode.js contains Access-Control-Allow-Origin:
http://siteB
, which I thought meant that MyCode.js was allowed to make cross-origin references to the site B. - The client triggers some functionality of MyCode.js, which in turn make requests to
http://siteB
, which should be fine, despite being cross-origin requests.
好吧,我错了.它根本不是这样工作的.所以,我已经阅读了跨域资源共享并试图阅读w3c 推荐中的跨源资源共享
Well, I am wrong. It does not work like this at all. So, I have read Cross-origin resource sharing and attempted to read Cross-Origin Resource Sharing in w3c recommendation
有一件事是肯定的 - 我仍然不明白我应该如何使用这个标题.
One thing is sure - I still do not understand how am I supposed to use this header.
我对站点 A 和站点 B 拥有完全控制权.如何启用从站点 A 下载的 javascript 代码以使用此标头访问站点 B 上的资源?
I have full control of both site A and site B. How do I enable the javascript code downloaded from the site A to access resources on the site B using this header?
附言
我不想使用 JSONP.
I do not want to utilize JSONP.
Access-Control-Allow-Origin
是一个 CORS(跨源资源共享)标头.
当站点 A 尝试从站点 B 获取内容时,站点 B 可以发送一个 Access-Control-Allow-Origin
响应标头来告诉浏览器该页面的内容可被某些来源访问.(来源是一个域,加上方案和端口号.)默认情况下,站点B 的页面任何其他来源都无法访问;使用 Access-Control-Allow-Origin
标头为特定请求源的跨域访问打开了一扇门.
When Site A tries to fetch content from Site B, Site B can send an Access-Control-Allow-Origin
response header to tell the browser that the content of this page is accessible to certain origins. (An origin is a domain, plus a scheme and port number.) By default, Site B's pages are not accessible to any other origin; using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin
header opens a door for cross-origin access by specific requesting origins.
对于站点 B 想让站点 A 访问的每个资源/页面,站点 B 应为其页面提供响应标头:
For each resource/page that Site B wants to make accessible to Site A, Site B should serve its pages with the response header:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
现代浏览器不会完全阻止跨域请求.如果站点 A 从站点 B 请求页面,浏览器实际上会在网络级别获取请求的页面,并检查响应标头是否将站点 A 列为允许的请求者域.如果站点 B 没有表明允许站点 A 访问此页面,浏览器将触发 XMLHttpRequest
的 error
事件并拒绝对请求的 JavaScript 代码的响应数据.
Modern browsers will not block cross-domain requests outright. If Site A requests a page from Site B, the browser will actually fetch the requested page on the network level and check if the response headers list Site A as a permitted requester domain. If Site B has not indicated that Site A is allowed to access this page, the browser will trigger the XMLHttpRequest
's error
event and deny the response data to the requesting JavaScript code.
在网络级别发生的事情可能比上面解释的稍微复杂.如果请求是 "non-simple"请求,浏览器首先发送一个无数据的预检"OPTIONS请求,以验证服务器是否会接受请求.当其中一个(或两者):
What happens on the network level can be slightly more complex than explained above. If the request is a "non-simple" request, the browser first sends a data-less "preflight" OPTIONS request, to verify that the server will accept the request. A request is non-simple when either (or both):
- 使用 GET 或 POST 以外的 HTTP 动词(例如 PUT、DELETE)
- 使用非简单的请求头;唯一的简单请求标头是:
接受
接受语言
内容语言
-
Content-Type
(只有在其值为application/x-www-form-urlencoded
、multipart/form-data
时才简单>, 或text/plain
)
- using an HTTP verb other than GET or POST (e.g. PUT, DELETE)
- using non-simple request headers; the only simple requests headers are:
Accept
Accept-Language
Content-Language
-
Content-Type
(this is only simple when its value isapplication/x-www-form-urlencoded
,multipart/form-data
, ortext/plain
)
如果服务器使用适当的响应标头(
Access-Control-Allow-Headers
对于非简单标头,Access-Control-Allow-Methods
)响应 OPTIONS 预检对于非简单动词)匹配非简单动词和/或非简单标头,然后浏览器发送实际请求.If the server responds to the OPTIONS preflight with appropriate response headers (
Access-Control-Allow-Headers
for non-simple headers,Access-Control-Allow-Methods
for non-simple verbs) that match the non-simple verb and/or non-simple headers, then the browser sends the actual request.假设站点A想发送一个
/somePage
的PUT请求,带有一个非简单的Content-Type
值application/json
,浏览器会首先发送一个预检请求:Supposing that Site A wants to send a PUT request for
/somePage
, with a non-simpleContent-Type
value ofapplication/json
, the browser would first send a preflight request:OPTIONS /somePage HTTP/1.1 Origin: http://siteA.com Access-Control-Request-Method: PUT Access-Control-Request-Headers: Content-Type
注意
Access-Control-Request-Method
和Access-Control-Request-Headers
是浏览器自动添加的;您不需要添加它们.此 OPTIONS 预检获得成功的响应标头:Note that
Access-Control-Request-Method
andAccess-Control-Request-Headers
are added by the browser automatically; you do not need to add them. This OPTIONS preflight gets the successful response headers:Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, PUT Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type
发送实际请求时(预检完成后),行为与处理简单请求的方式相同.换句话说,预检成功的非简单请求被视为与简单请求相同(即,服务器仍必须再次发送
Access-Control-Allow-Origin
以获得实际响应).When sending the actual request (after preflight is done), the behavior is identical to how a simple request is handled. In other words, a non-simple request whose preflight is successful is treated the same as a simple request (i.e., the server must still send
Access-Control-Allow-Origin
again for the actual response).浏览器发送实际请求:
PUT /somePage HTTP/1.1 Origin: http://siteA.com Content-Type: application/json { "myRequestContent": "JSON is so great" }
服务器发回一个
Access-Control-Allow-Origin
,就像一个简单的请求一样:And the server sends back an
Access-Control-Allow-Origin
, just as it would for a simple request:Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
有关非简单请求的更多信息,请参阅了解基于 CORS 的 XMLHttpRequest.
See Understanding XMLHttpRequest over CORS for a little more information about non-simple requests.