我怎样才能实现一个尾递归列表追加?
一个简单的追加功能,像这样(在F#):
A simple append function like this (in F#):
let rec app s t =
match s with
| [] -> t
| (x::ss) -> x :: (app ss t)
会当s变大崩溃,因为函数不是尾递归。我注意到,F#的标准附加功能不会大名单崩溃,所以它必须有不同的实现。所以,我在想:如何追加的尾递归定义是什么样子?我想出了这样的事情:
will crash when s becomes big, since the function is not tail recursive. I noticed that F#'s standard append function does not crash with big lists, so it must be implemented differently. So I wondered: How does a tail recursive definition of append look like? I came up with something like this:
let rec comb s t =
match s with
| [] -> t
| (x::ss) -> comb ss (x::t)
let app2 s t = comb (List.rev s) t
这工作,但看起来相当奇怪。是否有一个更优雅的定义是什么?
which works, but looks rather odd. Is there a more elegant definition?
传统(不是尾递归)
let rec append a b =
match a, b with
| [], ys -> ys
| x::xs, ys -> x::append xs ys
随着蓄电池(尾递归)
let append2 a b =
let rec loop acc = function
| [] -> acc
| x::xs -> loop (x::acc) xs
loop b (List.rev a)
随着延续(尾递归)
let append3 a b =
let rec append = function
| cont, [], ys -> cont ys
| cont, x::xs, ys -> append ((fun acc -> cont (x::acc)), xs, ys)
append(id, a, b)
其pretty直截了当将任何非尾递归函数与延续,以递归的,但我个人preFER蓄电池为直接的可读性。
Its pretty straight-forward to convert any non-tail recursive function to recursive with continuations, but I personally prefer accumulators for straight-forward readability.