速记嵌套空检查C＃

问题描述：

据我所知没有一个显著更优雅编写如下....

As far as I know there is not a significantly more elegant way to write the following....

string src;
if((ParentContent!= null)
    &&(ParentContent.Image("thumbnail") != null)
    &&(ParentContent.Image("thumbnail").Property("src") != null))
    src = ParentContent.Image("thumbnail").Property("src").Value

你觉得应该有一个C＃语言的功能，使这个短？结果
如果是这样，我应该看起来像结果
为例，像延长？??运营商

Do you think there should be a C# language feature to make this shorter?
And if so, what should it look like?
for example, something like extending the ?? operator

string src = ParentContent??.Image("thumbnail")??.Property("src")??.Value;

道歉为虚构的例子，我的过分简化的解决方案。

Apologies for the rather contrived example, and my over-simplified solution.

修改......许多年后结果
现在这是有计划的语言功能称为空传播运营商
的https：//罗斯林。 codeplex.com/discussions/540883 （感谢@布赖恩）

Edit ... Many years later
This is now a planned language feature called the "Null propagating operator" ?. https://roslyn.codeplex.com/discussions/540883 ( Thanks @Brian )

答

有没有内置的语法做这一点，但你可以定义一个扩展的方法来做到这一点：

There is no built-in syntax for doing this, but you can define an extension method to do this:

R NotNull<T, R>(this T src, Func<T, R> f) 
    where T : class where R : class {
  return src != null ? f(src) : null;
}

现在，你可以重写你的例子如下：

Now, you can rewrite your example as follows:

src = ParentContent.NotNull(p => p.Image("thumbnail")).
        NotNull(i => i.Property("src")).NotNull(src => src.Value);

这是不是很好，因为它可能是一个语法的支持，但我会说这是多少更具可读性。

It is not as nice as it may be with a syntactic support, but I'd say it's much more readable.

请注意，这增加了 NOTNULL 方法把所有的.NET类型，这可能是有点不方便。你可以解决通过定义一个简单的包装类型 WrapNull&LT; T&GT;其中T：类仅包含类型的值 T 键，用于打开任何引用类型为 WrapNull $的方法C $ C>，并在 WrapNull 键入提供 NOTNULL 。然后代码是这样的：

Note that this adds the NotNull method to all .NET types, which may be a bit inconvenient. You could solve that by defining a simple wrapper type WrapNull<T> where T : class containing only a value of type T and a method for turning any reference type into WrapNull and providing the NotNull in the WrapNull type. Then the code would look like this:

src = WrapNull.Wrap(ParentContent).NotNull(p => p.Image("thumbnail")).
        NotNull(i => i.Property("src")).NotNull(src => src.Value);

（这样你就不会污染每一种类型的新扩展方法的智能感知）

(So you wouldn't pollute the IntelliSense of every type with the new extension method)

通过更努力一点，你也可以定义一个LINQ查询运营商这样做。这是一个有点矫枉过正，但它有可能写这个（我将不包括这里的定义，因为它们的时间长一点，但它是可能的情况下，有人有兴趣： - ）。）

With a bit more effort, you could also define a LINQ query operators for doing this. This is a bit overkill, but it is possible to write this (I won't include the definitions here as they are a bit longer, but it's possible in case someone is interested :-)).

src = from p in WrapNull.Wrap(ParentContent)
      from i in p.Image("thumbnail").
      from src in i.Property("src")
      select src.Value;

相关推荐