IOS：广告中的应用程序的iOS
在我的应用程序，我想插入广告;我搜索谷歌，很多人只使用一个服务给他们的应用程序，在示例仅iAd的或仅AdMob的ECC .. 其他人说是在一个应用程序的广告更多的服务更好地插入;例如iAd的和AdMob（50％和50％），并且当的iAd没有响应的AdMob可以取代的iAd服务。 但是，什么是具有除iAd的2或3的服务，以服务的广告在特定应用程序的好处是什么？
In my app I want to insert advertising; I search on google and many people use only a service to their app, at the example only iAd or only adMob ecc.. Other people say that is better insert in an app more services for advertising; for example iAd and adMob (50% and 50%) and when iAd not respond adMob can replace iAd service. But what are the benefits of having 2 or 3 services in addition to iAd to serve advertisements in a specific app?
根据我的经验和放大器;读书，iAd的往往有最好的报酬了，，但的它并没有100％的填充率。这意味着只有部分的你的应用程序请求广告将它实际上得到一个时间。此外，iAd的是并非在所有国家（根据现场提供，你只应该服务于iAd的广告在美国，加拿大，墨西哥，英国，法国，德国，意大利，西班牙，澳大利亚，新西兰和日本，作为2013年4月4日）的
Based on my experience & reading, iAd tends to have the best pay out, but it doesn't have a 100% fill rate. That means only some of the time that your app requests an ad will it actually get one. Also, iAd isn't available in all countries (according to the site, you're only supposed to serve iAd ads in U.S., Canada, Mexico, U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Australia, New Zealand and Japan, as of April 4, 2013).
使用多个网络将允许你退回到另一个网络的情况下，这将有助于提高您的收益（因为你几乎总是有一个广告）。 AdWhirl是一个流行的框架，可以帮助您自动执行和管理你的应用程序中使用的比率和网络订购。
Using multiple networks would allow you to fall back to another network for those situations, which will help improve your revenue (because you'll nearly always have an ad). AdWhirl is a popular framework that helps you automate and manage the ratios and ordering of networks used in your app.
至于最好的，这总是很难指定。不同的人有不同的组合为他们工作好。可能的回落将导致比一个单一的网络更多的收益，但它肯定是更多的工作来设置和管理不是一个单一的网络。从我读过，iAd的与AdMob的回落可能是被视为最赚钱的配置。
As for best, that's always harder to specify. Different people have had different combinations work better for them. Likely falling back will result in more revenue than a single network, but it would definitely be more work to set up and manage than a single network. From what I've read, iAd with AdMob fallback is probably viewed as the most profitable configuration.