为什么不能推论unique_ptr的模板参数?
当您可以从C ++ 17获得类模板参数推导时,为什么不能推导std :: unique_ptr的模板参数呢?例如,这给了我一个错误:
When you have class template argument deduction available from C++17, why can't you deduce the template arguments of std::unique_ptr? For example, this gives me an error:
std::unique_ptr smp(new D);
上面写着类模板的参数列表丢失。
That says "Argument list of class template is missing".
模板参数(至少是指针类型)不是可推论的吗?
Shouldn't the template arguments (at least the pointer type) be deducable?
任何指定初始化的声明变量和
变量模板
any declaration that specifies initialization of a variable and variable template
我不再重复 @NathanOliver很好的答案中的基本原理,我只想提一下它的方法 ,力学,这也是我想你所追求的。没错,如果 unique_ptr
的构造函数看起来像......
I'm not going to repeat the rationale in @NathanOliver's great answer, I'm just going to mention the how of it, the mechanics, which is what I think you are also after. You are right that if the constructor of unique_ptr
looked merely like...
explicit unique_ptr( T* ) noexcept;
...可以推断 T
。编译器生成的推导指南可以正常工作。就像Nathan所说明的那样,这将是一个问题。但是构造函数是这样指定的……
... it'd be possible to deduce T
. The compiler generated deduction guide would work just fine. And that would be a problem, like Nathan illustrates. But the constructor is specified like this...
explicit unique_ptr( pointer p ) noexcept;
...其中别名 pointer
是指定如下:
... where the alias pointer
is specified as follows:
指针
:std ::如果存在该
,否则为
类型,则为remove_reference< Deleter> :: type :: pointerT *
。必须满足 NullablePointer 。
pointer
:std::remove_reference<Deleter>::type::pointer
if that type exists, otherwiseT*
. Must satisfy NullablePointer.
该规范实质上意味着指针
必须是 __ some_meta_function< T> :: type
的别名。 :: type
左侧的所有内容都是非推导上下文,这是防止从中推导 T
的原因。 指针
。即使指针
始终必须为 T *
,这也可以使这类推论指南失败。仅仅通过使其成为非推论上下文,就可以防止该构造函数生成的任何推论指南的可行性。
That specification essentially means that pointer
must be an alias to __some_meta_function<T>::type
. Everything on the left of ::type
is a non-deduced context, which is what prevents the deduction of T
from pointer
. That's how these sort of deduction guides could be made to fail even if pointer
needed to be T*
always. Just by making it a non-deduced context will prevent the viability of any deduction guide produced from that constructor.