锁定*和放大器;线程安全的IList＆LT; T＆GT;对于.NET
有没有无锁和放大器;实现IList线程安全的数据结构？
Is there a lock-free & thread-safe data structure that implements IList?
当然由无锁我的意思是一个实现，是没有用的锁定在.NET中原语，而是采用互锁操作/原子操作来实现线程安全... 没有一个，显然是在并发数据结构...
Naturally by lock-free I mean an implementation that makes no use of locking primitives in .NET but rather uses interlocked operations / atomic operations to achieve thread safety... There isn't one, apparently under the concurrent data structures...
有没有人见过漂浮？
我见过一个Java 1实施氨基CBBS ，所谓的 LockFreeVector 但没有对.NET至今。 任何想法？
I've seen a java one implemented in amino-cbbs, called LockFreeVector but nothing for .NET so far. Any ideas?
嗯，我找不到这样一类的任何地方;所以 我给它一个镜头
Well, I couldn't find such a class anywhere; so I gave it a shot.
该人士$ C $ C我的 ConcurrentList＆LT; T＆GT; 类的可以在GitHub上。
The source code for my ConcurrentList<T> class is available on GitHub.
这是无锁，线程安全的（我的认为的基础上，我的单元测试），和农具的IList＆LT; T＆GT; 。
It is lock-free, thread-safe (I think, based on my unit tests), and implements IList<T>.
它做的没有的支持插入， RemoveAt / 删除或清除。
It does not support Insert, RemoveAt/Remove, or Clear.
我很高兴地发现，我的实现（这是我想出了独立的）非常类似的数据结构的由一些德高望重的头脑发表的。
I was pleased to discover that my implementation (which I came up with independently) is very similar to that of a data structure published by some well-respected minds within the world of software.
有关实施本身的一个相当简短的讨论，请参阅我最近的博客帖子一下吧。
For a fairly brief discussion of the implementation itself, see my recent blog post about it.
目前，它不记录在所有的，这是一种不好的考虑如何狡猾的一些code是：（
At the moment, it is not documented at all, which is kind of bad considering how "tricky" some of the code is :(
和通过各种手段，如果你看看，发现错误或其它问题，撕裂了我一个新的。
And by all means, rip me a new one if you take a look and find bugs or other issues.
不管怎样，它可能是值得你花时间检查出来。如果你这样做，让我知道你在想什么。
Anyway, it might be worth your time to check it out. If you do, let me know what you think.